Guiding decision makers toward a more secure Asia by 2049
 
 
Welcome to the Project 2049 Institute website.
About Us People Research Publications Events Contact Us    
 

Subscribe

Email Address:

Asia Eye

RSS  RSS News Feeds

Get the latest news on your RSS feed reader.



rss rss
  YouTube

Watch the latest events and media on YouTube.



youtube

  Facebook

Follow the latest on Facebook.


  Twitter

Follow us on Twitter @Project2049


youtube

  Bookmark and Share

Email

|
 
 
 
 

 

Facebook

 

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

 
 
New at the Project 2049 Institute
Latest Publications
 

Negotiating History: The Chinese Communist Party’s 1981

Robert L. Suettinger

Over the decades, leaders of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have used the control of history to bolster their own political standing, as well as the continued primacy of the CCP in ruling the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This paper illustrates one of the most important cases of CCP historical manipulation through analysis of the political process surrounding the 1981 "Resolution on Certain Questions in the History of Our Party Since the Founding of the People’s Republic of China." From 1979-1981, Deng Xiaoping used his ability to control what would become the CCP’s official verdict on Mao Zedong’s legacy to supplant Mao’s appointed successor, Hua Guofeng. The ability to control history to maintain the CCP's political legitimacy has undeniably become a tool of power in the PRC. As the influence of the Chinese government and the CCP increasingly spreads abroad, it is important to understand how the CCP arrived at the “history” it exports.

Dangerous Truths: The Panchen Lama's 1962 Report and China's Broken Promise of Tibetan Autonomy

Matthew Akester

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has sustained a strategy to manipulate history and subjugate Tibet in order to maintain Party rule. As outlined in this paper, the CCP’s tactics against Tibet can be evidenced through its denial of a report critical of the Party's policies, authored by the 10th Panchen Lama in 1962. Through an analysis of the historical context surrounding the CCP's repudiation of this report, and the Party's resulting efforts to erase the grievances of the Tibetan people while imposing its own narrative, it is clear that the CCP views nationalist sentiment in Tibet as inimical to social stability. To counter that threat, the Party requires the active suppression and political compliance of the Tibetan people. Due to the CCP’s efforts, it is necessary to uncover the true historical record that proves the Party’s attempts to distort history and dominate Tibet for its own strategic ends.

New on AsiaEye

The official blog of the Project 2049 Institute

Insight #67:The Chinese Communist Party's Political War on Taiwan: The Assault on Taiwan's Diplomatic Allies

Insight #66:China’s Fault Lines: Challenges, Instability, and Response

Insight #65:1984 with Chinese Characteristics: How China Rewrites History

Insight #64:Bolstering Taiwan's Last Line of Defense

Insight #63:Can Cambodia Make Electoral History This Week?

Insight #62:The Chinese Communist Party’s Censorship Practices and Future Implications

For the latest AsiaEye articles visit our blog page

 

The Logic of Historical Nihilism: Analyzing the PRC Orthodoxy on the Origins of the Korean War

Miles M. Yu

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) utilizes its own narrative of the Korean War to fulfill the Party’s strategic interests. Historical evidence, illustrated in this paper, proves that the Korean War began on June 25, 1950 as a result of a long and arduous preparation and agreement among the three protagonists—Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Kim Il-sung. Today, significant research and historical documents prove the CCP's creation of a false record of the Korean War, which remains integral to Maoist historical nihilism and employed by the Party to ensure regime survival. Following the 67th anniversary of the beginning of the Korean War, it is necessary to examine the Korean War's historical legacy and the role of the manipulation of historical narratives in communist China.

The Limits of CCP Liaison Work: Sino-Vietnamese Relations

David Gitter and Elsa Kania

The PRC has fully leveraged its relative receptiveness to communist liaison work, carried out through CCP Central Committee’s International Department (CCP/ID). With Sino-Vietnamese tensions in mind, party-to-party exchanges have provided a more subtle channel for rapprochement. This party-centric dimension of diplomacy between China and Vietnam has received relatively scarce analytical attention thus far but remains active and important elements of the People's Republic of China's (PRC) pursuit of its foreign policy interests. CCP diplomacy has focused on appealing to the ruling Communist Party of Vietnam's (CPV) shared revolutionary heritage and socialist ideology, emphasizing the need to protect the overall special relationship that both countries supposedly enjoy.

The People's Republic of China and Burma: Not Only Pauk-Phaw

Bertil Lintner

Pauk-Phaw was a term coined in the 1950s to describe the supposedly friendly and close relationship between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and Burma. But despite such diplomatic niceties, relations between China and Burma have not always been especially cordial. China, a vast, mainly inland, empire, has always looked for outlets to the sea for its land-locked western and southwestern provinces. China will not easily give up its hard-won access to the Indian Ocean and Burma’s strategic importance to Beijing cannot be overestimated. As China sees it, it cannot simply “hand over” Burma to the West. The country is far too important strategically and economically to the PRC for that to happen.

SPOTLIGHT
WATCH CONFERENCE (Mar 30): China's Fault Lines: Challenges, Instability, and Response
WATCH CONFERENCE (Feb 27): 1984 with Chinese Characteristics: How China Rewrites History
WATCH CONFERENCE (Dec 13): Going Ballistic: The Taiwan Strait Crisis at 20
"China Has Its Own Problems With History" on the Diplomat by Randall Schriver, Project 2049 President/CEO.
Futuregrams

 

17-001: Getting the U.S.-China Relationship Right


 

16-002: Taiwan, Submarines, and Competitive Strategies for U.S.-China Competition

 

 

Challenges for the PLAN in the Western Pacific

16-001: The Nature of China's Rise and Why It Matters to the U.S. and Japan: A Japanese Perspective

 

 
The Project 2049 Institute | 2300 Clarendon Blvd | Suite 703 | Arlington, VA 22201 | (703) 879-3993 | [email protected]
 
 
Home | Support Project 2049 | Copyright 2013 Project 2049 Institute